Students’ Address Forms for Lecturers in Spoken and Written Interactions in Indonesian University Settings: Linguistic Choices and Influencing Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54923/jllce.v6i2.200Keywords:
Address terms, digital communication, politeness, university students, lecturers, Indonesian higher education settingsAbstract
Address terms play an important role in shaping social relationships and communication patterns in educational settings. Despite a growing body of sociolinguistic studies on the use of address terms in communication between students and lecturers in higher education, little research has focused on the forms of address used by Indonesian university students when interacting with their lecturers, either verbally or in writing. This study explores forms of address used by three Indonesian university students, especially those majoring in English language education, when communicating with their lecturers, as well as factors influencing these choices. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and the collection of personal documents, including WhatsApp chats, and analyzed following a thematic analytical framework. The findings reveal that students predominantly employed two categories of address terms: Indonesian kinship terms and English honorifics when addressing their lecturers. These choices were influenced by sociocultural settings, personal preferences, students’ perceptions of politeness, and the lack of explicit institutional guidelines. The findings offer insights into the dynamics of student-lecturer interactions in Indonesian higher education, highlighting the complex interplay between language, culture, and power. They also have implications for understanding communication patterns in multicultural and multilingual settings and for informing institutional policies on English language use in higher education.
Downloads
References
Afful, J. B. A. (2006). Address terms among university students in Ghana: A case study. Language and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470608668909
Ahmad, K. A. (2021). American English and Syrian Arabic forms of address: A contrastive analysis. Филологические Науки. Вопросы Теории и Практики, 14(12), 4032–4035. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20210622
Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., Nababan, M., & Santosa, R. (2024). Socio-pragmatic analysis of utterances with polite addressing terms: Translation shift across Arabic-English cultures. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2359764
Al-Khawaldeh, N. N., Olimat, S. N., & Mashaqba, B. M. (2023). Normativity and variation in the address terms system practiced among the Jordanian youth community. Languages, 8(31). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.3390/languages8010031
Al-Qudah, M. (2017). The Jordanian terms of address: A socio-pragmatic study. SHS Web of Conferences, 37, 01080. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173701080
Awoonor-aziaku, L. (2021). Address terms in classroom discourse: A case of University of Cape Coast students in Ghana. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11, 497–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.113037
Benjamin, J., Afful, A., & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2012). When ‘Sir’ and ‘Madam’ are not: Address terms and reference terms students use for faculty in a Ghanaian university. Sociolinguistics Studies, 6(3), 491–517. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1558/sols.v6i3.491
Bisilki, A. K. (2017). Bisilki: A sociolinguistic analysis of kinship terms in Likpakpaln (Konkomba). Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 6(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v6i3.2
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1988). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Studies in interactional sociolinguistics 4). In Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge (Vol. 22, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587263
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. Readings in the Sociology of Language, 252–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805376.252
Bruns, H. (2022). Terms of address: A contrastive investigation of ongoing changes in British, American and Indian English and in German. Contrastive Pragmatics, 3, 112–143. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10025
Burt, S. M. (2015). “There’s not a lot of negotiation”: Address terms in an academic department. In Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness (pp. 71–90). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Chen, X., & Ren, J. (2020). A memetic cultural practice: The use of generalized kinship terms in a research seminar attended by Chinese graduate students. Lingua, 245, 102942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102942
Cheng, C. Y. (2022). Chinese principles of human communication: A philosophical outline. In The handbook of global interventions in communication theory (pp. 253–265). Routledge.
Efrizah, D., Puspita, C., & Ali, N. (2025). Address system and politeness strategies in Batu Bara Malay social interaction. Journal of Language, 7(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30743/jol.v7i1.11156
Erni, E. (2016). The use of address forms and politeness in intercultural communication. The Indonesian Journal of Language and Language Teaching, 1(2), 53–62.
Formentelli, M. (2009). Address strategies in an academic setting: the University of Reading (UK). International Pragmatics Association, 19(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.3.02for
Formentelli, M. (2018). Strategies of address in English lingua franca (ELF) academic interactions. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(6), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2018.060605
Formentelli, M., & Hajek, J. (2016). Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language: Australian English, American English, and British English. Pragmatics, 26(4), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.4.05for
Hamzah, A. (2024). The factors influencing the use of address terms in English and Gorontalese: A sociolinguistic analysis. The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, 2(03), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v2i03
Houari, W. El, & Laabidi, H. (2025). Moroccan EFL students’ and teachers’ readiness for multicultural education. TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture, and Education, 5(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54923/jllce.v5i2.131
Karifianto, D. M. (2021). Address terms used by Australians: A case study of Melbourne. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 2(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v2i01.97
Kusumaningsih, D. (2015). Pemilihan bentuk sapaan kekerabatan sebagai strategi kesantunan berbahasa dalam interaksi di lingkungan kampus. Prasasti: Converence Series, 507–511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/pras.v0i0.234
Lasan, I. (2025). Salience in EFL speakers’ perceptions of formality: (In)formal greetings and address forms combined with (in)formal nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Sage Journal, 29(1), 174–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211055086
Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). In Waveland Press, Inc. (Vol. 53, Issue 95).
Murray, T. E. (2002). A new look at address in American English: The rules have changed. A Journal of Onomastics, 50(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2002.50.1.43
Nose, M. (2021). Persons and address terms in Melanesia: A contrastive study. In Indigenous Language Acquisition, Maintenance, and Loss and Current Language Policies (pp. 179–205). IGI Global. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2959-1.ch008
Parkinson, J. (2020). On the use of the address terms guys and mate in an educational context. Journal of Pragmatics, 161, 81–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.003
Punyanunt-carter, N. M., & Akdilek, S. (2025). Analyzing ideal traits and terms of address for male and female college professors. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 44(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21423/awlj-v44.a560
Revita, I. (2013). Pengaruh budaya lokal dalam sapaan berbahasa Inggris. Wacana Etnik: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/we.v4.i1.43
Saputra, J., Yohandoko, S., & Rusyn, V. (2024). Analysis of students’ communication politeness capabilities towards lecturers in an academic environment: Case study at FKIP Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya. International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research, 4(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v4i1.572
Situmorang, K. (2019). Indonesian students’ acquisition of English address terms: A case study in a university in the United Kingdom. Indonesian Research Journal of Ediuation, 2(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v2i2.4970
Soomro, M. A., & Larina, T. (2022). Categories of address forms in Pakistani English at a multilingual academic setting. Philological Sciences: Scientific Essays of Higher Education, 6s, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6s-22.050 1381
Surono, S. (2018). Address terms across cultures: A sociopragmatic analysis. Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018), 316–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/prasasti-18.2018.59
Wajdi, M., Aprianoto, A., Harahap, R. D., Mulyono, M., & Hadi, W. (2024). How Indonesian terms of address “bapak” or “ibu” and “kamu” are used in Indonesian educational settings. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 1(1), 1–9.
Yulianto, A., & Daniela, L. (2025). Navigating addressing terms in academic environment: Social context and dynamics at Jakarta International University in Indonesia. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 23(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33365/teknosastik.v23i2
Zavitri, I., Machmoed, H., & Sukmawaty, S. (2018). The address terms in English and Selayerese: A sociolinguistic perspective. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34050/jib.v6i1.4317
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Desylva Rima Kumalasari, Dery Tria Agustin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
