Cross-Journal Variation in Abstract Writing: Bundle-Driven Move Analysis in Applied Linguistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54923/jllce.v6i2.210Keywords:
Abstract writing, applied linguistics, corpus-driven approach, lexical bundles, rhetorical movesAbstract
This study examines how four-word lexical bundles function as indicators of rhetorical moves in research article abstracts from two applied linguistics journals representing different academic traditions: the Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) and Applied Linguistics (AL) by Oxford University Press. While previous studies have categorized bundles structurally and functionally, fewer have explored how they align with rhetorical moves across journal communities. Using a bundle-driven approach, with a specialized corpus, the Journal Abstracts of Applied Linguistics (JAAL) was compiled, comprising over 100,000 words from abstracts published between 2019 and 2025. Four-word sentence-initial bundles were extracted using AntConc 4.3.1 and analyzed with Hyland’s five-move abstract model. Findings show that clause-based bundles dominate in both IJAL (59%) and AL (80%), while PP-based bundles are least frequent in IJAL (7%), challenging earlier claims. Product bundles occur most often in IJAL (49%), whereas AL abstracts prioritize purpose bundles (46%) and use more flexible patterns, including self-mentions that perform multiple rhetorical roles. These differences reflect broader cultural and linguistic conventions in academic voice. The study demonstrates the link between lexical bundles and rhetorical moves and underscores implications for EFL instruction and genre-based writing pedagogy.
Downloads
References
Anthony, L. (2024). AntConc (Version 4.3.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/AntConc
Aji, A. K., & Haryanto, S. (2023, August). Structure of Lexical Bundles in Journal Scopus One: International Journal of English Studies. In International Conference on Learning and Advanced Education (ICOLAE 2022) (pp. 280-292). Atlantis Press.
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson.
Biber, D., Upton, T. A., & Connor, U. (2007). Discourse on the Move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Budiwiyanto, A., & Suhardijanto, T. (2020). Indonesian lexical bundles in research articles: Frequency, structure, and function. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2).
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397-423.
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33-43.
Coxhead, A., & Byrd, P. (2007). Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 129-147.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1995). Genre: How far can we, should we go? World Englishes, 16, 353–358.
Haq, A. S., Amalia, R. M., & Yuliawati, S. (2021). Lexical bundles of Indonesian and English research articles: Frequency analysis. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 5(1), 37-53.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207-226.
Hyland, K. (2002a). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
Hyland, K. (2002b). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 113-135.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21.
Insani, I., & Roselani, N. G. A. (2023). Bundle-move analysis in research article of science and technology: Connecting lexical bundles and rhetorical move. SULUK: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 5(1), 109-130.
Juanda, M. R., & Kurniawan, E. (2020, December). A comparison of rhetorical moves in students’ undergraduate thesis abstracts. In 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020) (pp. 443-448). Atlantis Press.
Kanafani, A., Nurcik, A. B., Harisbaya, A. I., Qurratu’aini, S. F., Kurniawan, E., & Lubis, A. H. (2021, November). Rhetorical move and linguistic features comparative analysis of research article abstracts by authors of different organizational backgrounds. In Fifth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2021) (pp. 129-135). Atlantis Press.
Kurniawan, E., & Sabila, N. A. A. (2021). Another look at the rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in international and Indonesian journal articles: A case of tourism research article abstracts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 318-329.
Li, L., Franken, M., & Wu, S. (2020). Bundle-driven move analysis: Sentence initial lexical bundles in PhD abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 85-97.
Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tajino, A. (2015). Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2, 1-11.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
Oktavianti, I. N., & Sarage, J. (2021). Lexical Bundles in Students’ Argumentative Essays: A Study of Learner Corpus. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(2), 510-534.
Pho, P. (2013). Authorial stance in research articles: Examples from applied linguistics and educational technology. Springer.
Ramadhini, T. M., Wahyuni, I. T., Ramadhani, N. T., Kurniawan, E., Gunawan, W., & Muniroh, R. D. D. A. (2021, April). The rhetorical moves of abstracts written by the authors in the field of hard sciences. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020) (pp. 587-592). Atlantis Press.
Samodra, M. C., & Pratiwi, V. D. R. (2018, August). Lexical bundles in Indonesian and English undergraduate thesis abstracts. In Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018) (pp. 183-191). Atlantis Press.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. University of Aston.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A., & Perkins, M. (2000). The function of formulaic language. Language and Communication, 20, 1-28.
Yoon, J., & Casal, J. E. (2020). Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step‐driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 462-478.
Yuliawati, S., Ekawati, D., & Mawarrani, R. E. (2021). Investigating lexical bundles in the corpora of English and Indonesian research articles with the sketch engine. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 20(2), 188-200.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Rizka Kadir, Aris Munandar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
